Engineered Languages

Constructed Languages

Course 1 ยท Chapter 4 ยท Engineered Languages

Chapter 3 looked at languages built to be spoken between people. An engineered language (engelang) is built for a different reason: to test an idea. The designer wants to know what happens to a language if one feature is pushed to an extreme. Is it possible to have a language with no ambiguity? How much can you say with a hundred words? This chapter follows two engelangs that answer those questions in opposite ways, then asks the big question behind both: does the language you speak shape the way you think?

Lojban: A Language Built on Logic

From Loglan to Lojban

Loglan was invented by James Cooke Brown, who began the work in 1955 and described it publicly in Scientific American in 1960. His aim was to examine whether language influences thought: if you gave people a language with a logical, unambiguous grammar, would it change how they reason? Disputes over the copyright of Loglan's words led a group of supporters to leave and found the Logical Language Group, who in 1986 decided to rebuild the entire vocabulary under a freely usable licence. The result was Lojban ("logical language"), with a baseline description completed in 1997 and published as The Complete Lojban Language.

How Lojban Works

The core of Lojban is the same idea as the logic of predicates. A sentence is built around a selbri (the relation) and its sumti (the things it relates). Every relation word comes with a fixed list of places, in a fixed order, so you always know what each slot means.

# klama: x1 goes to x2 from x3 via route x4 using means x5 mi klama le zarci I go the market # "I go to the market." The unused places (from, route, means) are left unspecified. # prami: x1 loves x2 mi prami do I love you

The vocabulary is also built to a plan. The root words, called gismu, number in the region of a thousand and three hundred and were chosen to be as recognisable as possible to speakers of the world's most widely used languages. The small grammar words are cmavo. Compounds, lujvo, are built by gluing root words together by fixed rules. Above all, the grammar is designed so that a computer can parse any correct sentence in exactly one way: no sentence is grammatically ambiguous.

Watch out: unambiguous grammar is not unambiguous meaning
Lojban removes grammatical ambiguity: there is only one way to read the structure of a sentence. It cannot remove semantic ambiguity entirely. A word can still be vague, and speakers can still say unclear things, because meaning depends on what people have in mind. The claim is "no structural ambiguity", not "no misunderstanding".

Toki Pona: A Language With About a Hundred Words

The Opposite Experiment

Toki Pona ("good language") was created by the Canadian linguist and translator Sonja Lang and first appeared online in 2001, with a full description in her book Toki Pona: The Language of Good (commonly called pu). Where Lojban adds precision, Toki Pona removes almost everything: the original book describes around 120 words, and a later dictionary lists 137 "essential" words along with some less-used ones. The idea is inspired by simplicity and positive thinking: what happens to expression when you have to say complex things with very simple building blocks?

How It Works

There are no inflections, no articles, no plural and no tense. A word's job comes from its position, and a few small particles mark the structure. Meaning for anything not in the list is built by combining words, so a friend is a good person.

mi moku e kili. # I eat fruit. (e marks the object) jan li moku. # The person eats. (li separates most subjects from the verb) jan pona # friend (jan "person" + pona "good") toki pona # good language / the language of good
LojbanToki Pona
Idea being testedCan grammar be made logically precise and machine-parsable?How much can a tiny vocabulary express?
VocabularyLarge and growing (well over a thousand root words)Around 120 to 137 core words
GrammarStrict, explicit, fixed places for each relationVery loose: word order and context carry the meaning
AmbiguityNone in the grammarA lot, resolved by context
Typical useLogic, discussion, translation experimentsEveryday simple conversation, art and a close community

Does Language Shape Thought? The Sapir-Whorf Question

Loglan was meant to test what is called the Sapir-Whorf hypothesis or linguistic relativity: the idea that the language you speak influences the way you think. It comes in two forms:

VersionClaimStatus
Strong (determinism)Language limits what you can thinkWidely rejected: people can think things their language has no word for, and learn the words later
Weak (influence)Language nudges habits of attention and memorySome experimental support in narrow areas, such as how colour terms or directions are described; the effects are small

For engelangs the question is practical. If the strong version were true, a language designed to remove ambiguity would make its speakers more logical, and a language with a handful of words would narrow their thinking. The evidence does not show either. What an engelang can fairly show is more modest: that a human language can work with a very different design, and that people can learn to use it. It tests what is possible in language, not how language shapes minds.

Common myths
  • "Lojban speakers can't be illogical." No: logic in the grammar does not make speakers reason well.
  • "Toki Pona can't say complex things." It can, but it takes more words and relies on context; precision costs words.
  • "Engelangs aren't real languages." Both have communities, texts and conversation; whether a tiny community is enough is a fair question, but they work as languages.

Hands-On Exercises

Exercise 1

Read the Lojban sentences from this chapter. For mi klama le zarci, say which word is the selbri, which are the sumti, and which of the five places of klama (goer, destination, origin, route, means) are filled and which are left empty.

๐Ÿ“„ View solution
Exercise 2

Translate between English and Toki Pona using mi, sina, jan, moku, kili, pona, e, li: (a) "You eat fruit." (b) "The person is good." (c) "I am a good person." (d) mi moku e kili. Then say what the sentences show about how much grammar Toki Pona has.

๐Ÿ“„ View solution
Exercise 3

Design a small experiment to test whether Lojban speakers reason better than English speakers. State what you would measure, one problem with the experiment (such as who learns Lojban), and what result would count as support for the weak form of the Sapir-Whorf hypothesis.

๐Ÿ“„ View solution

Chapter 4 Quick Reference

  • Engelang = a language built to test an idea
  • Loglan (Brown, 1955; public 1960) was meant to test linguistic relativity; Lojban (Logical Language Group, rebuilt from 1986, baseline 1997) is its free successor
  • Lojban: selbri + sumti with fixed places; roots gismu, grammar words cmavo, compounds lujvo; no grammatical ambiguity
  • Toki Pona (Sonja Lang, online 2001, book 2014): about 120 core words; mi moku e kili
  • Lojban removes structural ambiguity, not meaning's vagueness
  • Sapir-Whorf: strong form (language limits thought) is widely rejected; the weak form (influence) has small, narrow support
Coming next
Constructed Languages 5 turns to languages made for stories: Klingon, Dothraki and Na'vi, how a language is commissioned for screen, and why a fictional language needs just enough language.