Why It Matters
German Film & Television
Course 1 · Chapter 10 · Capstone: Confronting the Past on Screen
This last chapter follows one thread through the whole course: how German film and television have dealt with the Nazi years and, later, with the East German state. German has a long word for the process, Vergangenheitsbewältigung, usually translated as "coming to terms with the past", and a shorter one, Aufarbeitung, "working through". The chapter draws on the earlier ones, asks how the approach changed over time and what it tells us, and ends with suggestions for further reading and viewing. As in the rest of the course, it separates what can be checked from reputation and memory, and the exercises ask you to do the same. Recent events end with the 2026 cut-off.
Stages of Looking Back
| Period | Approach on screen | Examples |
|---|---|---|
| 1946–48 | Direct, brief: ruins, guilt and returning soldiers | The Murderers Are Among Us (Chapter 4) |
| 1950s | Mostly avoidance: escapism, and soldiers shown as victims; a few exceptions | Heimat films, war films, The Bridge (Chapter 4) |
| 1960s–70s | Challenge from a younger generation, mostly about the parents' silence | Oberhausen, New German Cinema (Chapters 4 and 6) |
| 1979–84 | A turning point: an American series prompts a German one | The Holocaust series, then Heimat (Chapter 8) |
| After 1990 | New subjects: the East, and the past as a source of drama and debate | Good Bye, Lenin!, The Lives of Others (Chapter 9) |
Silence, Then Argument
The pattern across the first two decades is that the screen, like society, looked away. The rubble films did look at the problem (Chapter 4), but their audience was small. The 1950s preferred romance, villages and soldiers who were presented as ordinary victims. It was left to the generation born in or just after the war to ask their parents' generation what it had done, and the film-makers of the Oberhausen Manifesto and of New German Cinema (Chapter 6) took up the question in their own ways, often through stories about families and political violence.
A Turning Point
In January 1979 an American television series on the Holocaust was shown on West German television, and the response was very large (check). It is often described as the moment when the subject entered the living rooms of ordinary families. Edgar Reitz is reported to have felt that Germans should tell the story of the period in their own way, and Heimat (1984) was his answer (Chapter 8). Whatever the exact chain of cause and effect, the later 1980s and 1990s brought a steady flow of documentaries, dramas and discussion programmes on public television.
Directly and by Indirection
- Directly. After 2000 a series of dramas dealt openly with the period. Downfall (2004), about the last days of Hitler, divided critics over whether showing him as a human being was wise or dangerous; Sophie Scholl: The Final Days (2005) told the story of a young woman in the resistance (check the titles and years). A later satire, Look Who's Back (2015), imagined Hitler returning to present-day Germany (check). The television drama Generation War (2013) provoked protests abroad (Chapter 8).
- By indirection. Many works were about the consequences of the past without showing it: families who did not speak, villages with unspoken histories, political violence in the 1970s, and the way the postwar economic recovery was built on silence.
- By restriction. Some propaganda films from the Nazi years remain restricted, shown only in special settings with an introduction (Chapter 3; check how this works now), a different way of handling the past that has its own supporters and critics.
The Second Past: the East
After 1990 the question had a second part. East German film and television had been controlled by the state (Chapters 5 and 7), films had been banned, and the secret police had watched everyone. Films released after the end of the state, such as banned films from 1965, and new films, such as The Lives of Others (Chapter 9), made the East a subject of its own. The danger on the other side was nostalgia, or "Ostalgie", which could make a dictatorship look like a quaint lifestyle. Good Bye, Lenin! plays with this danger knowingly, and it is why the film can be read as comedy and as comment.
What It Tells Us
About film and politics
Screens were used by the state for control in two German dictatorships and later became places where the state's past was questioned. The same medium served both.
About memory
A society does not remember all at once. It looked away, then asked, then argued, and the arguments continue. Films are part of how that happened, and not only a record of it.
About television
The public broadcasters, built to prevent a return of state control, have been among the main places where the past was discussed (Chapter 7).
About limits
No film can settle a question like this. The best of them raise it again for the next audience.
Record, Reputation and Memory
The same three categories from Chapter 1 apply to the whole course.
| Kind | Examples from the course |
|---|---|
| Record | UFA formed in 1917; the Oberhausen Manifesto of 1962; ARD in 1950 and ZDF in 1963; the 1965 bans at DEFA; Fassbinder's death in 1982 |
| Reputation | "The greatest silent film"; "the best of the Heimat films"; "the end of New German Cinema"; Kracauer's reading of the 1920s films |
| Memory | Which film you saw and when; who played whom; the feel of watching Tatort on Sunday evening or Dinner for One on New Year's Eve |
What to Read and Watch Next
- The films themselves. Watch one from each stage in the table above and compare how they treat the past.
- Archives and broadcasters. The public broadcasters' online libraries and the DEFA Foundation's holdings are good starting points (Chapters 5 and 7).
- Related courses. The sibling course Japanese Film & Television 1 asks similar questions about another country's screens, and the other Culture courses on this site, such as Jeux Sans Frontières (It's a Knockout): Europe's Game Show, place German television in a wider European setting.
- Histories and criticism. Look for histories of German cinema and broadcasting, and for studies of memory and film, which put the works in context.
- Your own memory. If you watched any of these, write down what you recall and then test each point against a source.
A Closing Thought
German film and television may look like a collection of genres, from silent horror to Sunday-night crime. Underneath, the thread that holds them together is a country working out, in public and in front of a camera, what to do with its own history. That makes it a good subject for a course, and a good reason to keep watching.
Exercises
Write a one-paragraph history of how German screens dealt with the Nazi past, naming at least one film or programme from each of Chapters 4, 6, 8 and 9.
Pick one claim from the course and classify it as record, reputation or memory. Explain what you would check to confirm it.
In about 150 words, compare how German screens deal with the Nazi past and with the East German past, giving one similarity and one difference.
Quick Reference
- Key term: Vergangenheitsbewältigung, "coming to terms with the past"
- Stages: direct (1946 to 1948), avoidance (1950s), challenge (1960s and 1970s), turning point (1979 to 1984), normal subject (after 1990)
- Turning point: the American Holocaust series (1979), then Heimat (1984)
- Direct dramas: Downfall, Sophie Scholl, Generation War
- The East: banned films, the Stasi, Ostalgie
- Habits: separate record, reputation and memory; check before quoting
Course complete. Return to German Film & Television 1 for the scope and sources.