Building Democratic Institutions in South Korea

Korean Political History I: Colonization, Division & the Road to Democracy

Chapter 9 · Building Democratic Institutions in South Korea

Chapter 8 ended with a direct election and a new constitution. This chapter describes the institutions that system now has and the evidence that it counts as a democracy. My source is one overview article on South Korean politics. It gives the structure and a few assessments but almost no dates for the years after 1987, so this chapter cannot narrate the presidencies or the peaceful transfers of power that the course outline promised. That gap is stated below.

The Structure

InstitutionWhat the source says
PresidencyA single five-year term by direct popular vote, with significant executive power.
National Assembly300 members serving four-year terms: 253 from single-seat constituencies and 47 through proportional representation.
JudiciaryA Supreme Court and a Constitutional Court, described as independent of the other branches.
Compare With Earlier Chapters A single term ends the pattern seen in Chapters 5 and 6, where Rhee and Park changed the rules to stay in office. The source states the current rule but does not say when it was set or who chose it. I would connect it to the 1987 Constitution, but that link is my reading, not the source's.

Civil Society and Party Politics

The source says the country operated under military authoritarian rule until 1987, after which "constitutional guarantees of freedom of association and expression expanded the scope of civil society." Two parties dominate: the centrist-left Democratic Party and the conservative People Power Party. Scholars describe an emphasis on "politics of the individual" over party loyalty, sometimes called a "partyless democracy."

A Label With a Definition Problem "Partyless democracy" is the source's own quoted term and I did not look up how scholars define or defend it. Note also that the parties named are the current ones, and I did not trace how they formed or changed names.

How Democratic Is It?

  • The Economist Intelligence Unit rated South Korea a "full democracy" in 2022.
  • V-Dem indices ranked it the fifth most electorally democratic Asian nation in 2024.
  • The source says the country experienced periods of democratic stagnation, particularly from the mid-2000s to the mid-2010s.
Read Indices With Care Rankings compress a judgment into a number, and the source gives no detail on how either index scores. The stagnation claim is also unspecified. I cannot say what the stagnation consisted of.

Accountability for the Past

Chapter 7 recorded that Chun was tried in 1995 to 1996 and pardoned in December 1997, and that 18 May became a national memorial day in 1997. Those events suggest a system prosecuting a former ruler and commemorating Gwangju within a decade of 1987, but the sources do not describe how the trials came about, so this is an observation, not a finding.

What This Chapter Does Not Cover I did not find the sequence of presidents since 1987, the first peaceful transfer between parties, the creation of the Constitutional Court, the restoration of local elections, or any of the individual scandals. The outline's phrase "peaceful transfers of power" therefore stays unproven here. Course II picks up the National Assembly, the presidency and the 2016 to 2017 impeachment.

Hands-On Exercises

Exercise 1

Set out the three branches of South Korean government as the source describes them, with one figure for each where given.

Exercise 2

A student writes "South Korea has been a stable democracy since 1987." Use the chapter's evidence to qualify the claim.

Exercise 3

List three things you would need to verify to support the phrase "peaceful transfers of power" and say what each would show.

Quick Reference

  • President: single five-year term, direct election
  • National Assembly: 300 members, four-year terms, 253 constituency and 47 proportional
  • Courts: Supreme Court and Constitutional Court
  • Parties: Democratic Party (centrist-left), People Power Party (conservative)
  • Assessments: "full democracy" (EIU, 2022); fifth most electorally democratic Asian nation (V-Dem, 2024); stagnation mid-2000s to mid-2010s
  • Not covered: presidents since 1987, first party transfer, Constitutional Court's founding