Music, the State and the Language
French Music
Course 1 · Chapter 10 · Music, the State and the Language
One thread has run through every chapter of this course: in France, the state has never been a bystander in music. A king granted a monopoly on opera, a revolutionary government founded a conservatoire, a national radio paid for tape experiments, a minister funded a research institute, and in the 1990s a law told radio stations how much of their output had to be in French. This final chapter pulls that thread together and asks the question the first chapter set: is French music a set of famous names, a national style or a national policy? It presents the arguments over the radio quotas and the language without taking a side. Names, dates and attributions are given from general knowledge and flagged where they should be checked.
Four Centuries of State Interest
| Period | What the state did | Chapter |
|---|---|---|
| Seventeenth century | Louis XIV used music as an instrument of royal power; Lully held a monopoly on opera | 2 |
| 1790s | The revolutionary government set up a national conservatoire and staged mass festivals | 3 |
| Mid-twentieth century | National radio funded Schaeffer's tape experiments; the postwar state backed the arts (check the details) | 8 |
| 1970s | The state funded IRCAM, led by Boulez, at the Centre Pompidou | 8 |
| 1980s | A culture ministry under Jack Lang supported popular music, and the Fête de la Musique was created (check) | this chapter |
| 1990s | Laws on the French language and a quota for French-language songs on the radio (check) | this chapter |
Looking at the table, one can see a long continuity: successive French governments, of very different kinds, have treated music as a matter of public interest. That continuity is itself a French characteristic, and it is part of what the English-speaking reader may find unfamiliar.
The Ministry of Culture and the Fête de la Musique
France created a ministry devoted to culture at the end of the 1950s, with the writer André Malraux as its first minister (check the details). Over the following decades the ministry funded theatres, orchestras, museums and festivals. In the early 1980s the minister Jack Lang extended this support to popular music, and in 1982 the first Fête de la Musique was held on 21 June, a day on which anyone can play in the streets and squares and concerts are free (check the date and the founders). The festival has since spread to many other countries, and it is perhaps the most popular result of state interest in music.
Funding
Public money for orchestras, opera houses, research institutes and festivals.
Regulation
Rules on broadcasting, authors' rights and, from the 1990s, the proportion of French-language songs on the radio.
Celebration
Events such as the Fête de la Musique, which present music as a shared civic good.
Education
The Conservatoire and the music schools, which train performers and composers.
The Radio Quotas
In the mid-1990s French law required radio stations to play a minimum proportion of French-language songs, a rule commonly described as 40 per cent, with a share reserved for new artists (check the figure and the details, which have been adjusted since). The aim was to protect French-language song and new French artists from being crowded out by international, mostly English-language, pop. It belongs to a wider French policy sometimes called the cultural exception, which holds that cultural goods should not be treated like other commodities in trade agreements (check). It also sits beside a law on the use of the French language passed in the same decade (check the details).
Language, Rap and the Francophone World
The rules about the French language raise a question that Chapter 9 introduced. French rap and pop use slang, verlan and borrowed words, and many artists come from families with roots outside France. A policy that protects "the French language" has to decide which French it means. Some see the current music as a vigorous living language, and others see the policy as a way to defend a standard against change. The question is open, and it is likely to remain so.
Back to the Question
Chapter 1 asked whether French music is a set of famous names, a national style or a national policy. The chapters since suggest that it is all three, and that each shaped the others. The names (Lully, Debussy, Piaf, Daft Punk) are known because institutions trained, funded or broadcast them. The style, such as the French colour of Chapter 4 or the French Touch of Chapter 8, is a claim made by critics and artists about their own tradition. And the policy, from the royal monopoly to the radio quota, is the frame that has made the other two possible.
Exercises
Choose three points on the state-interest table and describe, for each, what the state did and why it mattered to the music of the time.
State one argument for and one argument against the radio quota for French-language songs, and say which claim in each argument you would need to check.
Using at least three chapters of the course, argue whether French music is best understood as names, a style or a policy, or as a mixture, and give your reasons.
Quick Reference
- Thread: the state has long treated music as a public matter
- Stages: royal monopoly, Conservatoire, national radio, IRCAM, culture ministry, quotas
- Fête de la Musique: from 1982, on 21 June
- Radio quota: mid-1990s, a minimum share of French-language songs
- Arguments: supporters and critics both have a case; report both
- Question: names, style or policy? All three
- Check: the quota figures, the language law, the dates of changes
Course complete. For related subjects, see French Film & Television, which follows a similar path of state support and cultural argument on the screen.