Exercise 2: Process vs. Bureaucracy — Possible Solution
====================================================================

WHAT THIS CHAPTER MEANS BY THE WARNING
------------------------------
Per this chapter's warn-box, "every technique in this course has one
job: making incidents resolve faster and more reliably, and making a
repeat less likely. None of it is about filling out forms for their
own sake." The warning is that process steps can, over time, drift into
being performed out of habit or compliance rather than because they
still serve their original purpose.

THE TEST THIS CHAPTER OFFERS
------------------------------
Per this chapter, "if a step in this course's own process ever seems to
be slowing an incident down without adding real value, that's worth
questioning directly - process that doesn't serve the incident isn't
good process." The specific test is: does this step actually make the
incident resolve faster/more reliably or reduce the chance of a
repeat? If a step slows things down and doesn't contribute to either of
those two outcomes, it fails the test - regardless of whether it's a
formally established procedure.

WHY THIS MATTERS FOR HOW TO APPLY THE REST OF THE COURSE
------------------------------
This framing means every later chapter's own techniques (classification,
timelines, escalation, communication, review) should be judged by
whether they're genuinely helping in a given situation, not applied
mechanically as a checklist regardless of context - the chapter is
explicitly asking the reader to keep evaluating usefulness, not just
compliance.

WHY THIS WORKS AS AN ANSWER
------------------------------
It states the chapter's own stated purpose for every technique in the
course, and identifies the specific test (does it speed resolution or
reduce recurrence?) the chapter offers for distinguishing helpful
process from bureaucracy.