Exercise 3: Matching Methods to Two Different Customer Questions — Possible Solution ======================================================================================= "WHAT PERCENTAGE of customers are satisfied" is best answered by a SURVEY. It requires a scalable, structured instrument (e.g. a satisfaction rating scale) applied to a large enough sample of customers to produce a genuinely representative percentage - exactly the real strength this chapter identifies for surveys. "WHAT SPECIFICALLY frustrates the dissatisfied ones" is best answered by an INTERVIEW (or an open-ended follow-up with a subset of dissatisfied respondents). This question needs depth and the ability to ask follow-up questions to understand the actual reasoning behind a frustration - exactly the real strength this chapter identifies for interviews, and something a closed-ended numeric survey scale structurally can't provide on its own. A single method couldn't answer both well because each question needs a genuinely different kind of data. A survey alone could report that, say, 15% of customers are dissatisfied, but a numeric rating can't explain the reasoning behind that number. An interview alone could explain the frustrations of a handful of specific dissatisfied customers in depth, but a small interview sample has no real claim to represent the percentage of all customers who feel that way. This mirrors the chapter's own core point: each method distorts or constrains its own data in a specific way, and matching method to question - rather than picking one method and hoping it answers everything - is what genuine research design requires. ANSWER: Use a survey for "what percentage are satisfied" (scalable, structured, produces a representative proportion) and an interview for "what specifically frustrates dissatisfied customers" (depth, follow-up questions, explains reasoning a numeric scale can't capture). A single method can't answer both because each question needs a genuinely different kind of evidence - scale versus depth. WHY THIS WORKS AS AN ANSWER ------------------------------ This matches each sub-question to the correct method using the chapter's own stated strengths, and explains specifically why the other method alone would be insufficient for that sub-question.