Exercise 3: Three Quick, Checkable Predatory-Journal Red Flags — Possible Solution ===================================================================================== Three specific, checkable items from the chapter's own table, each verifiable within about five minutes on a journal's own website: 1. LOOK UP THE EDITORIAL BOARD BY NAME. Search for two or three of the listed editorial board members individually. A legitimate journal's editors are real, findable people with a genuine, verifiable affiliation and publication history. If the names don't turn up anywhere else, or several claim they were never actually asked to join, that's a real, checkable red flag. 2. CHECK WHEN AND HOW FEES ARE DISCLOSED. Look for a clearly stated "Article Processing Charge" or publication fee page before ever submitting anything. If fee information is vague, hidden, or only appears after a paper has already been accepted, that matches the chapter's own predatory-journal warning sign directly. 3. VERIFY ANY CLAIMED INDEXING OR IMPACT FACTOR. A journal claiming to be indexed in a recognized real database (such as PubMed or Web of Science) can be checked directly against that database's own real search tool. A claimed "impact factor" from an unfamiliar, unverifiable service - rather than a real, recognized index - is a real, checkable warning sign. ANSWER: (1) Search editorial board members individually to confirm they're real, findable, and actually affiliated with the journal; (2) check whether the fee structure is disclosed clearly before submission rather than only after acceptance; (3) verify any claimed database indexing or impact factor directly against the real database itself rather than trusting the journal's own unverified claim. WHY THIS WORKS AS AN ANSWER ------------------------------ Each item is drawn directly from the chapter's own comparison table, made genuinely actionable and checkable within a short, specific time frame, matching exactly what the exercise asked for.