Exercise 2: ERB vs. Blade's @php — Possible Solution
====================================================================

WHAT THEY GENUINELY SHARE
------------------------------
Per this chapter, both ERB's <% %> tags and Blade's @php directive technically allow full, unrestricted host-language code - real Ruby in ERB's case, real PHP in Blade's case - with no curated allow-list of tags or filters standing between the template and the language.

THE REAL DIFFERENCE
------------------------------
Per this chapter, Blade normally chooses not to use raw PHP for everyday template logic, reaching instead for its own sugared directives like @if and @foreach, which compile down to the same plain PHP @php would let through directly - @php exists as an escape hatch from that sugared default style. ERB has no separate sugared layer to escape from in the first place - <% %> already is the entire language, by design, not a fallback option chosen only when the normal template syntax isn't enough.

WHY THIS WORKS AS AN ANSWER
------------------------------
It correctly identifies that both mechanisms permit the same underlying capability - full host-language code - and correctly explains the real distinction: Blade's raw-PHP access is an escape hatch from a sugared default, while ERB's raw-Ruby access is simply what the syntax always is, with no separate sugared alternative underneath it.