Exercise 2: A Visible Placeholder, Not Just an Absence — Possible Solution
====================================================================

WHY authorize() CURRENTLY RETURNS true
------------------------------
Per this chapter, UpdatePageTitleRequest's authorize() method deliberately returns true for now, matching the same deliberate no-auth-check-yet gap the sibling Next.js and Django rebuild courses both left open in their own Chapter 8 equivalents, to be closed one chapter later once real admin authentication exists.

WHY THIS IS A VISIBLE, STRUCTURAL PLACEHOLDER RATHER THAN A SIMPLE ABSENCE
------------------------------
Per this chapter's own central finding, Laravel's FormRequest class has a dedicated authorize() method, structurally separate from rules(), specifically for permission checks - a real, explicit place in the code whose entire job is to answer "is this user allowed to do this." Because that method exists and must return something, the current gap isn't just a missing check the way the sibling courses' own gaps were; it's a genuine line of code, return true;, sitting in a method built for exactly this purpose. Anyone reading the class can see, structurally, that a permission decision is being made here - it just isn't a real one yet - rather than having to notice that no check exists at all.

WHY THIS WORKS AS AN ANSWER
------------------------------
It correctly explains that authorize() returning true reproduces the same deliberate gap left open by the sibling courses, and correctly explains why Laravel's dedicated authorize() method makes that gap structurally visible in the code itself rather than merely an absent check.