Exercise 3: The Missing Error Handling — Possible Solution
====================================================================

WHAT ACTUALLY HAPPENS RIGHT NOW
------------------------------
The view calls requests.get() with no try/except around it at all. If Open Food Facts is slow, times out, or is simply unreachable, that call raises an unhandled exception inside the view function. Django's own default behavior for an unhandled exception in a view is to return a raw, generic 500 Internal Server Error page to whoever made the request - not a clean, meaningful JSON error response the caller could actually do something useful with.

WHY THIS IS A GENUINE, KNOWN GAP
------------------------------
A caller of this endpoint - eventually the app's own frontend - has no reliable way to distinguish "the product genuinely wasn't found" (which already returns a clean 404 with a JSON error body) from "the whole request failed unexpectedly," since the latter currently produces Django's own generic crash page instead of a predictable JSON shape. This chapter explicitly names this as a known simplification rather than claiming the view is production-ready as written - a real production version would wrap the request in proper error handling and return a clean, consistent error response instead of letting the exception propagate uncaught.

WHY THIS WORKS AS AN ANSWER
------------------------------
It correctly describes the unhandled exception and the resulting generic 500 error page as the actual current behavior, and correctly explains why this is a genuine gap - inconsistent, unhelpful error responses for callers - rather than treating the current code as already complete.