The Nazi Party's Rise

German Political History I: Empire, War & Weimar's Collapse

Chapter 7 · The Nazi Party's Rise: From Fringe Movement to Legal Power (1933)

Chapter 6 ended with the NSDAP's own real electoral surge peaking at 37.3% in July 1932 — the largest party in the Reichstag, but never a majority. This chapter covers the six months between that peak and 30 January 1933, and its own central, real finding is the one this course has been building toward since Chapter 1: Hitler did not seize power. He was appointed to it, through a completely legal act, by an elected President operating within powers Chapter 4's own Constitution had granted him from the start.

November 1932: The Surge That Stalled

The Nazi Party's own momentum did not simply escalate in a straight line to power. In the November 1932 election, NSDAP support genuinely declined — down to 33.09% and 196 seats, a real loss of 34 seats from July's peak, on turnout that fell for the first time since 1928. The real, contemporary assessment was blunt: "a great disappointment for the Nazis." Still the largest single party, the NSDAP had once again failed to translate its own real support into anything resembling a governing majority — Chapter 5's own negative-majority problem, still fully intact.

Schleicher's Real Gamble: Splitting the Nazi Party From Within

General Kurt von Schleicher became Chancellor on 3 December 1932 with a genuinely different strategy from his predecessors: rather than negotiating with Hitler directly, he tried to fracture the NSDAP itself. On 4 December 1932, Schleicher met with Gregor Strasser, a real senior Nazi figure, and offered him the post of Minister-President of Prussia in exchange for splitting his own faction away from Hitler's own leadership — the real "Querfront" ("cross-front") strategy, betting that the threat of a genuine Nazi split would force Hitler to cooperate with the existing government instead of demanding the chancellorship for himself.

Why the gambit failed Hitler moved decisively to isolate Strasser within the party before the split could materialize, and Schleicher's own leverage collapsed with it. His government was already weakening on other fronts: he gambled on calling another election rather than accepting a Reichstag recess that might have let his own public-works programs show results, and by late January senior army officers had withdrawn their support, having concluded — a real, striking judgment in its own right — that only the Nazis, not Schleicher, could genuinely "mobilise popular support." On 28 January 1933, Hindenburg refused Schleicher's own request for emergency powers — the same real Article 48 tool Chapter 4 traced from Ebert's cooperative use through Chapter 5's own account of a Reichstag no government could work with. Schleicher resigned the next day.

Papen's Real Scheme: "We've Hired Him"

Franz von Papen — Schleicher's own predecessor and rival — had spent these same weeks cultivating Hindenburg privately. Papen secretly told Hitler he still held real influence with the President, and that he would help make Hitler Chancellor on one condition: Papen himself would serve as Vice-Chancellor. Papen's own real calculation was that a cabinet with Hitler as titular head but genuinely dominated by conservative, non-Nazi ministers could "tame" him — contain the Nazi movement's own energy inside a government conservatives still actually controlled.

Finding: a real, concrete minority cabinet — the specific bet Papen was making Hitler's first cabinet, formed 30 January 1933, had roughly twelve posts in total — the Chancellorship, the Vice-Chancellorship, and ten Reich ministries. Only two other NSDAP members held cabinet seats alongside Hitler himself: Wilhelm Frick as Interior Minister and Hermann Göring as Minister Without Portfolio (and Prussian Interior Minister). Papen held the Vice-Chancellorship exactly as planned; the remaining posts went to conservatives and independents — DNVP leader Alfred Hugenberg took Economics and Agriculture, and several ministers, including Foreign Minister Konstantin von Neurath, were direct holdovers from the previous government. On paper, Papen's own bet looked sound: a cabinet Nazis barely outnumbered.

30 January 1933: A Legal Appointment, Not a Coup

Hindenburg appointed Hitler Chancellor on 30 January 1933 — an entirely ordinary exercise of the same presidential appointment power Chapter 4 traced back to the Weimar Constitution's own real design, and, before that, the same appointment power Chapter 1 identified as belonging to the Kaiser alone under the old Imperial Constitution. There was no putsch, no seizure by force, no unconstitutional act comparable to Chapter 3's own extra-legal 9 November 1918 transfer of power to Ebert. Historians mark this distinction directly in the German language itself: Machtergreifung ("seizure of power") is the older, more dramatic term; Machtübernahme ("assumption/transfer of power") is the more precise one — the transfer took place entirely within the existing constitutional framework.

Finding: every structural thread this course has traced converges on this single legal act Chapter 1 established a Chancellor who answers to an appointing power, not to the elected chamber directly. Chapter 4 replaced the hereditary Kaiser with a directly elected President — but kept that same underlying appointment mechanism intact. Chapter 5 showed a Reichstag structurally incapable of producing a positive majority, only ever a negative one. Chapter 6 showed a Depression that had made the largest of the negative-majority parties genuinely popular, even without a majority of its own. None of these four real, separately-traced threads was a single point of failure on its own — each was compatible, in isolation, with a functioning democracy, exactly as Chapter 4's own honest complication about Ebert's use of Article 48 already showed. What this chapter demonstrates is what happened once all four converged on one moment, one appointment, one signature: a legal, constitutional act, using powers the Constitution's own framers had built for entirely different purposes, that put a movement explicitly hostile to that same Constitution in charge of enforcing it.

Hands-On Exercises

Exercise 1

Explain why the November 1932 election result is an important real complication to the popular idea that the Nazis' rise to power was a single, unbroken electoral escalation.

Exercise 2

Explain Schleicher's real Querfront strategy in your own words, and why Hitler's move against Gregor Strasser was enough to defeat it.

Exercise 3

Explain why the real distinction between "Machtergreifung" and "Machtübernahme" matters for understanding this chapter's own central claim — and connect it back to Chapter 3's own account of the extra-legal November 1918 power transfer.

Quick Reference

  • November 1932: NSDAP declines to 33.09% (196 seats), down from July's 37.3% (230 seats) — "a great disappointment for the Nazis"
  • 4 December 1932: Schleicher's real Querfront strategy — offering Gregor Strasser the Prussian Minister-Presidency to split the NSDAP; fails once Hitler isolates Strasser
  • 28 January 1933: Hindenburg refuses Schleicher's request for Article 48 emergency powers; Schleicher resigns
  • Papen's real bet: Vice-Chancellor in a Hitler cabinet with only 2 other NSDAP ministers (Frick, Göring) among ~12 posts — believing Hitler could be "tamed"
  • 30 January 1933: Hindenburg legally appoints Hitler Chancellor — a normal constitutional act, not a coup
  • Machtergreifung vs. Machtübernahme: "seizure" vs. "transfer" of power — historians favor the latter term precisely because the act was legal