Challenge 3: Missing Report Detail in the Deck Is Correct, Not a Mistake — Solution Walkthrough

Why this is correct behaviour, not an oversight:

The deck was never meant to contain everything the report does — its
job is to distill the report down to a handful of key takeaways for
a LIVE audience, per Chapter 9's own central argument: a slide is
glanced at for a few seconds while a presenter talks, not read start
to finish the way the report itself is. Reproducing "half the
report's key details" on slides would recreate exactly the "Death by
Bullet Points" problem Chapter 9 warned against — dense, text-heavy
slides that compete with the presenter rather than supporting them.
The deck deliberately leaving detail out is the capstone's Step 8
working as intended, not a step that got skipped.

Where that missing detail should genuinely live instead:

Two places, both already built into this capstone: the Word REPORT
itself (Steps 1-6) already contains that full detail, in its proper
structured, styled form — anyone wanting the complete picture reads
the report, not the deck. And any detail specifically the PRESENTER
needs close at hand while actually talking through a given slide
belongs in that slide's own Speaker Notes (Chapter 11, Step 10) —
visible only to the presenter, never cluttering what the audience
sees.

WHY THIS WORKS AS AN ANSWER
------------------------------
This exercise is a direct test of whether the distinction Chapters 9
and 11 built up across two separate chapters was actually understood
as ONE coherent idea: a live slide's job and a written report's job
are genuinely different, and "the deck doesn't have everything" is
success, not a gap to be patched by copying the report's own
paragraphs back onto the slides.