Challenge 3: "Full Chapter" vs. "General Suite Knowledge" — Solution Walkthrough

The actual difference between the two labels:

"Chapter X — full chapter" means this course dedicated an entire
chapter to explaining that specific concept in depth, including its
underlying reasoning, its genuine differences (or lack thereof) from
the Microsoft Office equivalent, and worked exercises — Styles (Ch.2),
Page Styles (Ch.3), Mail Merge (Ch.4), the Master Slide (Ch.7), and
Presenting (Ch.8) all received this full treatment. "General suite
knowledge, not a dedicated chapter here" means the capstone still
uses a real, genuine LibreOffice feature (Table of Contents, Track
Changes, Impress animations) to complete that step, but this course
never explained that specific feature in its own dedicated chapter —
it was left for the reader to apply directly, since it works
essentially identically to its already-familiar Word & PowerPoint
equivalent, per this course's own stated scope from Chapter 1: leaning
on the completed Excel and Word & PowerPoint courses rather than
re-teaching every single concept from zero.

Why both kinds of step were still worth including in a complete capstone:

A capstone's whole purpose is proving the FULL original project can
actually be rebuilt, not just the specific pieces this particular
course happened to dedicate full chapters to. Leaving out the ToC,
Track Changes, or animation steps entirely would have produced an
incomplete rebuild that doesn't actually mirror the original Word &
PowerPoint capstone's real scope. Including them, even briefly and
without a full dedicated explanation, keeps the capstone honest about
what a genuine end-to-end rebuild actually requires — while still
being transparent, via the comparison table's own labelling, about
exactly which pieces this course explained in depth and which pieces
it deliberately left for the reader's own existing suite familiarity
to carry.

WHY THIS WORKS AS AN ANSWER
------------------------------
This exercise tests whether the capstone's own transparent labelling
system was actually understood as a deliberate choice, not an
oversight — the two-label system exists specifically so a reader can
tell, at a glance, which parts of the rebuild they can trust this
course to have taught in depth, and which parts they're expected to
apply using general familiarity already built up from working through
Chapters 1 through 9.