linguistics1-1  Exercise 2: Bird, Sneeze and Arbitrariness
==========================================================

Any three languages will do. One possible set:

  Meaning      English    French    German     Hungarian
  -----------  ---------  --------  ---------  ----------
  bird         bird       oiseau    Vogel      madar
  to sneeze    sneeze     éternuer  niesen     tüsszent

Analysis:

  "Bird" is a clear case of arbitrariness. Nothing in the sound of bird,
  oiseau, Vogel or madar resembles a bird, and the four words share almost
  nothing. (German Vogel and English fowl are historically related, but that
  is shared ancestry, not a natural link between sound and meaning.)

  "To sneeze" is closer to onomatopoeia in some languages, because the sound
  of the verb can echo the sound of a sneeze. Where a word looks like an
  imitation, the languages differ in how they imitate: each one fits the
  imitation into its own sound system.

How this supports the claim: if the link were natural, bird would be
similar everywhere. It is not.

How it does not contradict it: the claim is that the link is MOSTLY
arbitrary, not that it is always arbitrary. Imitative words are a small
exception, and even they are shaped by each language's conventions, so no
two languages imitate a sound in exactly the same way.

(The word choices in your own table will differ; check that your reasoning
distinguishes arbitrary words from imitative ones.)