The Submission & Review Process
A clean, policy-compliant, well-tagged image from Chapters 4–6 still has to pass an actual review before it can earn anything — the gate that makes this course's own model genuinely different from every sibling course in this subject.
How Review Actually Works
Reviewers check technical quality (Chapter 4), policy and disclosure compliance (Chapter 5), and metadata accuracy (Chapter 6) before an image goes live. Turnaround typically takes days, varying by platform and current submission volume — this is one more reason Chapter 1's own honest, slow-build framing matters: even a technically perfect submission doesn't earn anything until review actually completes.
Common Rejection Reasons
- Visible technical artifacts or insufficient resolution (Chapter 4)
- Genuine similarity to content already saturating the catalog
- Inaccurate or excessive keywords (Chapter 6)
- Undisclosed AI content or a genuine copyright/trademark concern (Chapter 5)
- A composition that's commercially unusable — e.g. no clear space for a buyer to overlay their own text
Handling a Rejection
Read the actual reason given, and fix that specific issue — resubmitting the same image unchanged just repeats the same outcome. Most platforms allow resubmission once the underlying problem is genuinely addressed.
- Have I read the exact rejection reason, not just noted that it was rejected?
- Does my fix address that specific issue, not a guess at what might be wrong?
- Am I checking this same issue on my other in-progress submissions before they're rejected too?