Generating High-Quality AI Images

Selling AI-Generated Stock Photos
Course 1 · Chapter 4 · Generating High-Quality AI Images

Chapter 3 was honest about where AI struggles — this chapter covers the actual generation workflow that minimizes those weaknesses, regardless of which genre you're working in.

The Generation Workflow

1

Write a specific, detailed prompt

Lighting, composition, and camera/lens-style descriptors genuinely improve output quality over a vague, short prompt — the same specificity principle this whole subject keeps rediscovering, applied here to visual generation.

2

Generate multiple variations

Never accept the first output — generate several and compare, the same multi-run testing discipline Selling AI Prompts applies to text prompts, applied here to visual quality instead of textual reliability.

3

Select the cleanest result

Pick the variation with the fewest visible artifacts, using the checklist below.

4

Upscale for resolution requirements

Stock platforms require specific minimum resolutions for commercial licensing, often higher than an AI tool's native output — an AI upscaling step is frequently a necessary part of the pipeline, not optional.

5

Do a final artifact check at full size

Zoom into the final, upscaled image and check it carefully — artifacts invisible in a small preview can become obvious at full resolution.

Common Artifacts to Check For

  • Warped or extra fingers, or an unnatural number of limbs
  • Garbled or nonsensical text anywhere in the background
  • Asymmetric or uncanny facial features
  • Inconsistent lighting or shadow direction across the image
  • Illogical reflections in glass, water, or mirrors
Visual reliability testing, the same discipline as text Selling AI Prompts found that a "lucky" one-off output isn't a reliable product — the same principle applies here. One good-looking image out of ten attempts tells you the prompt can occasionally work, not that it reliably will; generating several and genuinely comparing them is what actually produces a submittable image consistently.
A careless submission wastes real review time Submitting an image with a visible artifact you could have caught yourself doesn't just risk rejection — it costs the real review turnaround time Chapter 7 covers, time you could have spent on a genuinely submission-ready image instead.
Coming up next Chapter 5 covers the platform-specific AI-content policies and copyright considerations that apply before any image is ever submitted.