What Survived

The Story of Old English

Course 1 · Chapter 10 · What Survived

The last chapter asks what is left. Old English did not vanish in 1066: it changed, it was nearly forgotten, and it was then rediscovered by people with their own reasons. This chapter covers what the sources say about the legacy in Modern English, who saved the manuscripts, and where the question of Modern English's ancestry stands. It ends with a recap of the whole story.

The story in one box Old English is not the main source of Modern English words: according to Wikipedia's English language article, French dialects contributed about 28% and Latin another 28%. But most basic everyday vocabulary is still Germanic, and the grammar and sound system remain Germanic. The manuscripts that survive owe a great deal to sixteenth-century collectors such as Archbishop Matthew Parker, who had religious reasons for publishing them.

What is left in Modern English

QuestionWhat the English language article says
Share of vocabularyOld English is not the main source of the lexicon: French dialects about 28%, Latin "an additional 28 per cent"
Everyday wordsMost basic everyday vocabulary remains Germanic, which is the part of the lexicon most tied to Old English
Grammar and sound"Grammar and phonology remain Germanic" despite heavy borrowing
InflectionOld English had far more inflections; Modern English keeps case only in pronouns (he/him, she/her), and verb forms are reduced to a few, like speak, speaks, speaking, spoke, spoken
Irregular formsStill being regularised, as in dreamed replacing dreamt

I read only the first 100,000 of about 254,000 characters of that article, which did not reach its Vocabulary section or the full Grammar section, so I do not give a list of the most common English words that come from Old English. The article did not discuss plurals or irregular verbs as a specific legacy. The courses Old English Grammar 1 and Old English Reading 1 let you see for yourself how much a Modern English speaker can recognise.

The question left open: Modern English's ancestry

Chapter 3 recorded the claim in Wikipedia's Old English article that Standard English descends from Mercian rather than West Saxon, and Scots from Northumbrian, and noted that the article tags both "citation needed". I went looking for something firmer for this chapter. The later part of the Old English article (characters 100,000 to 200,000) made no statement on the descent of Standard English. The Middle English article read for Chapter 9 says London English developed from East Midland-influenced speech and that early Scots developed from Northumbrian Old English in lowland Scotland. That supports the Scots half of the claim at the level of one Wikipedia article. For Standard English, I can only say what the sources say: London English, East Midland influence, and the Chancery Standard of about 1430. Whether that makes Mercian the ancestor is a link I could not confirm from them.

Watch out "Modern English comes from West Saxon" and "Modern English comes from Mercian" are both too simple. The sources I read describe a chain, not a single line: Late West Saxon as the written standard of 1000, then regional Middle English, then a London-based standard in the fifteenth century. Treat any one-line answer as a summary of that chain.

How the manuscripts were saved and found again

Wikipedia's Matthew Parker article gives his dates as 1504 to 1575, and says he was Archbishop of Canterbury from 1559. His collection was "largely collected from former monastic libraries" and left to his Cambridge college, Corpus Christi, where the Parker Library holds most of it. It includes Version A of the Anglo-Saxon Chronicle, the oldest manuscript in Chapter 6. In 1567 he published a homily on the Sacrament by Ælfric (Chapter 8), and he also published A Testimonie of Antiquitie, an Old English homily. The article says his manuscript work was meant to show that the English Church was historically independent of Rome, and that the homilies were meant to show that transubstantiation was not the doctrine of the ancient English Church. His work with Laurence Nowell is said to have laid the foundation for Anglo-Saxon studies. The article does not tie his collecting to the Dissolution of the Monasteries or date it, so I do not.

  • Nowell: the codex that holds Beowulf is named after him (Chapter 8).
  • Thorkelin, 1786: the first transcriptions of Beowulf, then the first complete edition, in Latin (Chapter 8).
  • Dictionaries: the Old English article mentions Somner's Dictionarium Saxonico-Latino-Anglicum and Bosworth's dictionary of 1838, and names the Dictionary of Old English and Bosworth–Toller among modern dictionaries.
  • Tolkien: the article names J. R. R. Tolkien and Alistair Campbell among later writers on Old English. I did not read about their work.

A caution from that article: it says purist and neo-Old English online communities were found, in one study, to contain basic grammatical errors. That is a reminder of why this course names its sources.

The whole story in ten steps

ChapterThe point to remember
1 Before EnglishBrittonic and Latin were spoken in Britain before English arrived
2 The SettlersGermanic settlers came; 449 is only a traditional date
3 Four DialectsNorthumbrian, Mercian, Kentish and West Saxon; most of the record is West Saxon
4 Writing It DownRunes first, then the Latin alphabet with the added letters
5 The Early TextsBede wrote in Latin; Cædmon's Hymn, if Bede is right, dates from 658 to 680
6 Alfred and Written EnglishAlfred's programme of translation and the Chronicle (common core about 893)
7 The VikingsThe Danelaw (to 1066 as a legal region) and the Norse words, including they
8 The Late AgeThe Benedictine reform, Ælfric, Wulfstan, and the late copies of the poetry
9 1066 and AfterConquest, French and Latin; Middle English; the Peterborough Chronicle to 1154
10 What SurvivedGermanic grammar and basic words stayed; the manuscripts were saved by collectors

Where to go next

This course stops at about 1150. A planned course, The History of the English Language, would carry the story on to the present; it has no outline yet. The Timeline and Map pages in the appendix put the dates of this course in one place and the dialect areas on a sketch map.

Words to know

TermMeaning
LexiconThe words of a language
AntiquarianA person who studies the past through old objects and texts
TranscriptionA written copy of a text
LegacyWhat is left behind or passed on
Neo-Old EnglishThe article's label for modern attempts to write in an imitation of Old English

✏️ Try It Yourself

Think of the answer first, then click to check. Items 6 to 8 look back over the whole course.

1. What shares of Modern English words does the article give to French and to Latin?

Show answer

About 28% from French dialects and another 28% from Latin.

2. What stays Germanic in Modern English despite the borrowing?

Show answer

The grammar and phonology, and most basic everyday vocabulary.

3. In Modern English, where does case survive?

Show answer

Only in pronouns, such as he/him and she/her.

4. Why did Matthew Parker publish Old English homilies?

Show answer

The article says to show the English Church was historically independent of Rome, and that transubstantiation was not the doctrine of the ancient English Church.

5. Which Chronicle manuscript is held in the Parker Library?

Show answer

Version A (the oldest, from Chapter 6).

6. Put in order: the Great Heathen Army lands; the Battle of Hastings; the Christian mission arrives (597); Alfred wins at Edington.

Show answer

The mission (597), the Great Heathen Army (865), Edington (878), Hastings (1066).

7. Which Norse-derived pronouns replaced the older English ones?

Show answer

They, them and their (Chapter 7); the article says they are "thought to" derive from Old Norse.

8. Why is "Modern English comes from West Saxon" too simple?

Show answer

The sources describe a chain: Late West Saxon as the written standard, then regional Middle English, then a London-based standard (Chancery) in the fifteenth century. Whether Mercian is the ancestor is not confirmed in what I read.

Note on sources This chapter uses Wikipedia's English language (the first 100,000 of about 254,000 characters), Matthew Parker (the first 100,000 of about 122,000), and, for the open question, characters 100,000 to 200,000 of Old English (about 208,000 in all) plus the Middle English article from Chapter 9. All came through the page tool's summaries. Pages I tried for the history of Old English scholarship (Anglo-Saxon studies) did not cover it, and I did not read any dedicated study of it. I did not read about Tolkien's or Campbell's work, and I did not find a list of common English words from Old English. The recap table, the "chain" wording and the term definitions are mine and unverified. The Parker article's remarks on the Dissolution of the Monasteries are not in what I read, and I do not make them.
Still to come: the appendix, with a Timeline page (the dates of this course in one list) and a Map page (a sketch of Britain with the dialect areas).