Many Languages
Jeux Sans Frontières (It's a Knockout): Europe's Game Show
Course 1 · Chapter 6 · Many Languages, One Show
A programme watched in several countries has an obvious problem: the people in it speak different languages. Jeux Sans Frontières solved this partly by designing games that need no explanation and partly through a production system that shared pictures but not words. This chapter explains how the shared broadcast worked, who did what, and why the arrangement was both practical and a little fragile. The overall method is well known, but the technical and organisational details are not fully documented in public sources, so the chapter stays at the level that can be stated safely.
One Set of Pictures
For each episode, one broadcaster, usually the one from the host country, produced the main television signal: the cameras, the vision mixing and the pictures of the games. That signal was sent through the Eurovision network to the other participating broadcasters (Chapter 3). All countries therefore saw the same event at the same time, with the same camera angles and the same replays.
Many Voices
What differed was the words. Each national broadcaster added its own commentary, spoken by its own commentators in its own language (Chapter 5). The result was that a viewer in one country heard a commentator who supported the local team, explained the rules in a familiar way and made the jokes that audience would understand.
| Part of the broadcast | Shared or national? |
|---|---|
| Pictures from the arena | Shared |
| Natural sound of the crowd and games | Shared |
| Commentary | National, in each country's language |
| Studio presentation and local links | Mostly national |
| Rules and scoring | Agreed jointly in advance |
On the Ground: Interpreters and Referees
On location, the production needed to communicate with teams and officials from several countries. The referees, who dealt directly with all the teams, needed to give instructions that the competitors understood, and accounts of the show commonly describe them as working in several languages. Interpreters and bilingual staff were used as needed. The details of who covered which language vary between accounts and between years.
The Role of the EBU
The European Broadcasting Union was the organisation that linked the broadcasters, and it provided the framework in which the show could run: the technical network, the agreement among members and a forum for settling common rules. Individual broadcasters were responsible for the teams and for producing their own national episodes. The EBU's role is better described as coordination than as ownership of the format.
Cooperation and Its Strains
A programme that depends on many broadcasters agreeing has weak points. The rules had to be understood the same way in every country. Hosts took turns to stage events, which spread the cost but meant different production teams with different styles. National commentators could emphasise their own team. These strains are part of the story in Chapter 8, where disputes and accusations are covered.
What Viewers Saw
For a viewer, the effect was of a programme that felt local and international at once. The language was familiar, the faces on the screen were from different countries and the contest had a national side to cheer for. The shared pictures were what made the international contest feel real, since everyone was watching the same event.
Exercises
List which parts of the broadcast were shared and which were national, and say why this split worked for a game show.
Describe the role of the European Broadcasting Union in the show, and explain why "coordination" is a better word than "ownership".
Give two strains that cooperation between many broadcasters could cause, and one reason to treat practical details such as interpreter numbers with caution.
Quick Reference
- Shared: pictures and natural sound, sent through Eurovision
- National: commentary, studio links, language
- EBU: coordination, the network and common agreement
- On location: referees and staff working in several languages
- Strains: shared rules, different production teams, partisan commentary
- Caution: practical details are poorly documented
Next chapter: It's a Knockout: The British Version, which follows the programme as it was made and remembered in the United Kingdom.