The Page-Based Workflow

Video Editing Fundamentals

Chapter 2 · The Page-Based Workflow

Chapter 1 flagged a real learning curve without explaining it concretely. This chapter is that concrete explanation — the seven pages Resolve organizes its entire workflow around, and how that compares to Premiere Pro's own genuinely different design.

Seven Pages, Seven Dedicated Environments

Media, Cut, Edit, Fusion, Color, Fairlight, Deliver — each one a full, dedicated workspace for one part of the editing process, switched between via tabs at the bottom of the window, rather than one single window trying to accommodate every task at once.

Media Page

The entry point for any project — importing and organizing footage. This is the first stop for any project, with its own full treatment in Chapter 3.

Cut vs. Edit Page

A genuinely unusual design choice: two separate editing pages rather than one. Cut is a fast, simplified editing environment built for quick assemblies and simple cuts. Edit is the full, traditional multi-track timeline editor with deeper control. Cut is optional — Edit page alone covers everything Cut does and more — but Cut exists specifically for speed on simpler projects where Edit's own greater depth isn't actually needed.

Fusion, Color, Fairlight, Deliver Pages

Each gets its own dedicated chapter later in this course: Fusion — node-based compositing and motion graphics (a first look in Chapter 5). Color — professional color grading (Chapter 6). Fairlight — full audio post-production (Chapter 7). Deliver — export and rendering (Chapter 8).

Premiere Pro's Contrasting Philosophy

Premiere Pro instead uses a single, unified window — panels for effects, timeline, color, and audio all exist within one interface, rearranged via panel layout rather than switched via dedicated top-level pages. Neither approach is objectively better; this is a genuine design philosophy difference, not a feature gap between the two.

TaskResolve's own pagePremiere's own approach
Importing/organizingMedia pageProject panel
Quick assemblyCut pageSame timeline, simplified view
Full editingEdit pageTimeline panel
Color gradingColor page (dedicated)Lumetri Color panel
AudioFairlight page (dedicated)Requires Audition for equivalent depth
This is the learning curve Chapter 1 mentioned
Chapter 1's own "steeper learning curve up front" is exactly this page structure — a genuinely different top-level organization than a single-window editor, now explained concretely rather than left as an abstract warning.
Cut and Edit aren't redundant — they trade depth for speed differently
It's tempting to assume that since both Cut and Edit let you edit a timeline, one of them must be pointless. They solve genuinely different needs: Cut trades some depth for speed — ideal for quick social clips or fast assemblies — while Edit trades some speed for full professional control. An editor working on a quick, simple cut might genuinely prefer Cut's own streamlined tools; a complex, precise edit genuinely benefits from Edit's own deeper toolset. The right choice depends on the actual task at hand, not an assumption that one page must be strictly better than the other.

Hands-On Exercises

Exercise 1

You need to quickly trim a handful of clips into a rough sequence for a short social media clip, with no need for advanced multi-track editing. Which page from this chapter fits best, and why?

📄 View solution
Exercise 2

An editor working on a complex, multi-layer project with precise timing needs argues Cut page is "useless since Edit page can do everything it can and more." Using this chapter's own warning box, explain what this argument misses.

📄 View solution
Exercise 3

Explain, in your own words, why Resolve's page-based structure and Premiere Pro's single-window structure are described in this chapter as a design philosophy difference rather than one tool simply having more features than the other.

📄 View solution

Chapter 2 Quick Reference

  • Seven pages: Media, Cut, Edit, Fusion, Color, Fairlight, Deliver — each a dedicated environment for one part of the process
  • Cut — fast, simplified editing for quick assemblies; Edit — the full, traditional multi-track timeline
  • Cut and Edit aren't redundant — they trade depth for speed differently, matched to the actual task
  • Premiere Pro uses one unified window instead of dedicated pages — a genuine design philosophy difference, not a feature gap