The Page-Based Workflow
Video Editing Fundamentals
Chapter 2 · The Page-Based Workflow
Chapter 1 flagged a real learning curve without explaining it concretely. This chapter is that concrete explanation — the seven pages Resolve organizes its entire workflow around, and how that compares to Premiere Pro's own genuinely different design.
Seven Pages, Seven Dedicated Environments
Media, Cut, Edit, Fusion, Color, Fairlight, Deliver — each one a full, dedicated workspace for one part of the editing process, switched between via tabs at the bottom of the window, rather than one single window trying to accommodate every task at once.
Media Page
The entry point for any project — importing and organizing footage. This is the first stop for any project, with its own full treatment in Chapter 3.
Cut vs. Edit Page
A genuinely unusual design choice: two separate editing pages rather than one. Cut is a fast, simplified editing environment built for quick assemblies and simple cuts. Edit is the full, traditional multi-track timeline editor with deeper control. Cut is optional — Edit page alone covers everything Cut does and more — but Cut exists specifically for speed on simpler projects where Edit's own greater depth isn't actually needed.
Fusion, Color, Fairlight, Deliver Pages
Each gets its own dedicated chapter later in this course: Fusion — node-based compositing and motion graphics (a first look in Chapter 5). Color — professional color grading (Chapter 6). Fairlight — full audio post-production (Chapter 7). Deliver — export and rendering (Chapter 8).
Premiere Pro's Contrasting Philosophy
Premiere Pro instead uses a single, unified window — panels for effects, timeline, color, and audio all exist within one interface, rearranged via panel layout rather than switched via dedicated top-level pages. Neither approach is objectively better; this is a genuine design philosophy difference, not a feature gap between the two.
| Task | Resolve's own page | Premiere's own approach |
|---|---|---|
| Importing/organizing | Media page | Project panel |
| Quick assembly | Cut page | Same timeline, simplified view |
| Full editing | Edit page | Timeline panel |
| Color grading | Color page (dedicated) | Lumetri Color panel |
| Audio | Fairlight page (dedicated) | Requires Audition for equivalent depth |
Hands-On Exercises
You need to quickly trim a handful of clips into a rough sequence for a short social media clip, with no need for advanced multi-track editing. Which page from this chapter fits best, and why?
📄 View solutionAn editor working on a complex, multi-layer project with precise timing needs argues Cut page is "useless since Edit page can do everything it can and more." Using this chapter's own warning box, explain what this argument misses.
📄 View solutionExplain, in your own words, why Resolve's page-based structure and Premiere Pro's single-window structure are described in this chapter as a design philosophy difference rather than one tool simply having more features than the other.
📄 View solutionChapter 2 Quick Reference
- Seven pages: Media, Cut, Edit, Fusion, Color, Fairlight, Deliver — each a dedicated environment for one part of the process
- Cut — fast, simplified editing for quick assemblies; Edit — the full, traditional multi-track timeline
- Cut and Edit aren't redundant — they trade depth for speed differently, matched to the actual task
- Premiere Pro uses one unified window instead of dedicated pages — a genuine design philosophy difference, not a feature gap