Challenge 1: A Simple Speaker Name/Title Caption — Solution Walkthrough

The right tool:

The Edit page's own built-in title tool.

Why, per this chapter's own material:

This tool handles simple text overlays directly — font, size,
position, and basic animation presets — described as fast and
genuinely sufficient for straightforward captions, lower-thirds, or
simple title cards. A speaker's name and title at the bottom of the
screen is precisely a lower-third, exactly the use case this tool is
built for.

Why reaching for Fusion would be unnecessary here:

Per this chapter's own material, Fusion offers node-based compositing
for genuinely custom motion graphics, animated logos, or complex
multi-element titles — real capability that isn't needed for a simple,
static text caption. Choosing Fusion here would mean taking on
genuinely more complexity (a fundamentally different way of building
visual content) for a task the simpler, faster built-in title tool
already handles completely.

The general principle this illustrates:

Per this chapter's own Chapter 2 comparison, this mirrors the same
"match the tool to the actual need" judgment already established
there — reaching for the more powerful tool when the simpler one
already covers the task adds unnecessary complexity without any real
benefit.

WHY THIS WORKS AS AN ANSWER
------------------------------
This exercise is a direct, practical application of this chapter's own
basic-titles-vs-Fusion distinction to a task specifically matching the
built-in title tool's own described strength.